Loading...
Loading...
infrastructure-costs-tip-in-favour-of-fcev-trucks-over-bevs
infrastructure-costs-tip-in-favour-of-fcev-trucks-over-bevs

Infrastructure costs ‘tip in favour’ of FCEV trucks over BEVs

With larger volume adoption, infrastructure costs tip in favour of Fuel Cell Electric Trucks (FCETs) over Battery Electric Trucks (BETs), according to a new Quantron white paper.

At low volume adoption, infrastructure costs for BETs are much lower than the cost of setting up even a small hydrogen refuelling station (HRS). However, a HRS has the advantage of being able to refuel much more trucks in a day, leading to a better utilisation rate and amortisation.

Currently, depending on its capacity, a hydrogen tank can be filled with gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar pressure in about 20-30 minutes to enable the FCET to have a real driving range of 600-700 km. With technical improvements, the refilling time could potentially drop to 10-15 minutes in the future, which is comparable to the refuelling time in conventional diesel fuelled Heavy Duty Trucks (HDTs).

“This offers FCETs a significant edge,” it notes.

... to continue reading you must be subscribed

Subscribe Today

Paywall Asset Header Graphic

To gain access to this article and all our other content, you will need to subscribe to H2 View.

From the latest print editions, to 24/7 online access to exclusive interviews, authoritative columnists and the H2 View news archive, a subscription is the best way for you to stay up to date with developments in the hydrogen community.

Please wait...